Archive for the ‘Universities’ Category

Universities Ripe to become Woodstocks of Education?

Friday, March 8th, 2013

Living in a decade where number of graduates graduating in a year might be more than the number of graduates ever graduated in the human history, time has come for Universities and Colleges to re-evaluate their role in the future of education & pursuit of knowledge.

Congrats on graduating. Sorry we cannot hire you!

Graduate Inflation!

Graduates are suffering from what I call “dual forces of inflation” - on one hand we have too many graduates and on the other hand value of graduation is dropping by mile a minute. Jobs based economy is being sidelined by creation & collaboration based flat work environments.

Access Knowledge is no longer the concern!

Access Knowledge is no longer the concern!

With Knowledge Democratization happening across the industrial nations, how can Universities reinvent their role and continue to be relevant?

 

Universities are ripe to become Woodstocks of Education.

 

This blog is inspired by Thomas Friedman’s article about Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) in New York Times.

Harvard Professor Michael Sandel visits Korea after a ton of Koreans learning from his “Justice” course via their national television. Professor Sandel lectures in Korea infront of 14,000 people – an opportunity that only opened up because of remote access to his amazing material to thousands of Koreans.

After a sold out album, rock group U2 did their U2 360 Tour in all the major stadiums for two years for their fans who already enjoyed their music album.

How different is what Professor Sandel did to what U2 or any Music group does? Not a whole lot.

 

What do I mean by Woodstocks of Education?

  • Students could visit various Universities to refine their knowledge learned via remote sources. Universities will start to shift to the next stage of learning – refining, polishing, experimenting and boot camps. 
  • Student Qualifications to come to these events will be based on frequent demonstration of their knowledge via standardized tests that are common for the current systems. With this, focus in current institutions is moved from providing “access” to knowledge to what can be done with the learning.
  • Professors with best online courses will attract the most attention and will also attract the brightest of the brightest students. So, unlike a music rockstar visiting your home town, students visit the Professor’s affiliated University to have that rich and immersive interaction.
  • Currently Universities are offering networking and incubation opportunities on top of their existing programs. The focus and emphasis will start to shift towards these new models over time. For example, while incubation, acceleration are in a sense 21st century version of vocational training programs, these will get upgraded to become the main staple of their existence.

Biggest knock against MOOC is lack of social interactions, networking abilities, co-located learning & collaboration. With Universities refining their models to foster “educational festivals”, that concern might be easily addressed.

With all these potential changes, its hard to imagine if the practice of getting “graduation degree” will stay the same. Employers need to look for something else other than a degree to assess their entry level employee qualifications. Could Entrepreneurship or some refined form of that play a role or filtering mechanism in future?

- This blog is intended to be provocative, drive discussion, ideation and ultimately action!

- @Vsistla

 

The Future Project: Breathing Creativity, Passion & Dreams into High School Youth!

Friday, December 14th, 2012

Initially inspired by The Future Project and its mission.

The Future project is a gargantuan effort to uproot maladies of our High Schools – most of them took birth during the last century of industrial revolution. An era dictated by punishing failures, questioning unconventional thinking and so on – that ultimately hamstrung many young minds to pursue their dreams and realize their passions.

“Most people are not really free. They are confined by the niche in the world that they carve out for themselves. They limit themselves to fewer possibilities by the narrowness of their vision.”

V. S. Naipaul

I believe the narrowness of our vision and lack of curiosity has been etched into our thinking due to our current education systems. As children we don’t limit our thinking to a particular niche. Its the so called “education” and societal forces snub our creativity and appetite for risk taking.

While most of the 20th century schooling & education system worked for that era, it might not work for the future generations for various reasons.

Here are some of the reasons why we need to think differently – fundamentally a revolutionary way – for the 21st century

Current Thinking Grew out of Age of Scarcity

19th & 20th centuries lived through the phase of finite resources, depression and focused on creating efficiencies to tap and acquire those finite resources.

workhardinschooltogetagoodgrade

To that end, majority of the schools & institutions worked with a blueprint to teach basic facts and knowledge to become efficient with the finite resources. For example, kids read their Textbooks, do well in their class, get good grades, graduate and that becomes a validation of their capabilities; then they go on to get a job based on that “qualification”.

When you manage for scarcity, you only need to think “out of box” to create efficiencies to tap into the scarce resources. You don’t need a revolutionary way of thinking.

Few innovators & thought leaders have created industrial complexes (thank you Seth Godin) around concepts & ideas that took birth in 19th century. These industrial complexes needed many widget makers to serve the markets and needs of the industries. Schools & Universities got funded to serve the job market for these industrial complexes.

Majority of masses didn’t need to be dreamers, thought leaders, innovators & high achievers to prosper and thrive. They just need to get through high school in early 20th century and in later part of the century, graduate from college to get a job and buy a house – the basic american dream.

thinkers_cartoon

In 20th century most of the revolutionary innovations such as railroads, airplanes, and industrial complexes have powered the opportunities. To that end, schools, educational institutions and organizations have structured to ride off of those innovations to create sustainable growth in the society via the “widget makers” otherwise known as college graduates, they churn out year after year.

Today with more and more graduates, 20th century industrial complexes don’t have enough jobs to serve growing job seekers. Of course automation also impacted demand side of mass work force.

With this kind of “good enough for a job” thinking, most of the schooling experience has become mundane, rote and insipid.

algebratest

Not only that, over the years, schools and education systems have forgotten the real purpose of education & learning – more importantly ignored to convey that to their students.

math_cartoons25

Innovation Cycles of 20th Century have been already tapped in: Need Next Generation Engines that power the 21st Century.

The concept of tossing your graduation hat on the day of graduation ceremony symbolically meant that you are qualified for a job; 21st century is not about that.

In 21st century Wikipedia should replace Textbooks; Time spent towards teaching basic concepts, knowledge & facts should be replaced by powering creativity, passion & experimentation. Khan Academy and its clones can handle most of basic sciences, knowledge and facts.

If 20th century was about learning the facts & gaining knowledge, 21st century is about making something out of that knowledge. 20th century was able learning the history and 21st century should be about making your own history.

Jobs Economy is past! Creation Economy is the future

What’s unique about the 21st century is about nonexistent jobs economy and it took massive financial meltdown (2007 to 2011) caused by skullduggery of few greedy bankers to surface the inevitability. Many smart and well-qualified graduates realized that in a hurry. In cities such as NYC and SFO, this inability to find jobs let to the first wave of “mass” creation thinkers. Established entrepreneurs, high net worth individuals and thought leaders joined hands to create accelerators and incubators to feed off the supply created by job less economy.

For those young graduates who are already in search for jobs the choice was clear – either keep sending resumes via LinkedIn & Monster or go meet other smart people and create something on their own. Fortunately cost of experimentation has also gone down to help fuel this trend – at least in the technology and consumer Internet space.

When you educate a kid for a job that is currently available in the society today, that job no longer exists by the time kid graduates.

Maker & DIY projects are no longer left to handful of tinkers who are naturally passionate about such projects. Maker & creation revolution is already showing its signs of growth amongst those graduates who are not able to find the jobs. Tech, Health Care IT and Fin Tech incubators and accelerators are powering these jobs less graduates.

But, what about High Schools kids? Someone needs to sow the seeds of creativity; someone needs to ignite their passions; someone needs to rekindle their young minds.

Schools do a good job teaching basic sciences and skills – a basic hygiene – for living in a society. While these basic skills and knowledge is necessary, it is no longer sufficient if these young minds want to go become a future Rockefeller, Martin Luther King, Dalai Lama, Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein and Mahatma Gandhi. Also, 20th century survived with one of each, but 21st century needs many Rockefellers, many Martin Luther Kings, many Dalai Lamas and many Newtons.

Where is the ray of hope for our high school students?

The Future Project (TFP) might be the answer!

Its not easy …..but the revolution has to start somewhere by someone to make a dent and I see that ray of hope in this mission and few others. Efforts from CitizenSchools.Org & Teach for America and the like along with TFP will add fuel to this revolution.

Coders, Developers, Techies vs Coding Languages – Their Mutual Life Cycles!

Tuesday, November 27th, 2012

Forces that dictate the success, failure & survival of a coding language

Every newly invented coding language will have various forces that help, hurt and hinder its growth & survival in the long run. I feel these are some of the forces – am sure there are more forces.

Coding Language/Tech Growth Diamond

This is I call “Language Growth Diamond” – which is driven and dictated by various aspects such as its use cases, target platforms, growth of the market needs, # of new developers entering vs # of current developers abandoning the language for newer/more efficient languages, and so forth.

Coding Language/Tech Growth vs Developer Pool

As a new coding language/tech grows, its pool of developers grow and shrink based on some of the forces discussed above along with individual tech developer objectives, goals and propensity to learn a new language or abandon an existing language.

 

 

Coding Language/Tech Phases vs Type of Developers Entering/Abandoning a Language

Coding language growth/maturity some how dictates the type of developers that embrace and ignore the language/tech. Type of developers is based on their level in their career and other factors discussed later in this blog.

 

 

Developer Age/Career Level vs Ability/Goals/Life Event Mapping

Developer age, their cognitive ability, they career goals, career aspirations, their life events, and propensity to learn something new dictates the duration of a developer to be an active developer.

In the age of automation, how relevant is SpellingBee for the future generation?

Friday, January 15th, 2010

SpellingBee – A tradition that started somewhere around 1875 as fun and friendly exercise is becoming irrelevant in the information age by the minute. I got that realization when my 9 year old nephew didn’t have to know the exact spelling to a word while typing his school home work in Microsoft Word.

So, is the SpellingBee

spelling bee

heading into a Web …..biting the dust?

deadbee

Over the decades until 1980s, with heavy use of Typewriters and less intelligent early computers, spelling accurately carried its cache. In the age we live in with teens spending 80% to 90% of their writing either on a computer or on a cell phone/text, how relevant is Spelling for the next generations? I proved my case if you know these acronyms – LOL, JK, TC, TXT or these emoticons – ;) , :( and so forth …..

Unlike the title suggests, the issue at hand is much larger than Irrelevant SpellingBee …..

Over the years, in the civilized world, we have dropped few habits and picked up some newer ones -

For example …..

During the early days of Automobile, drivers mentally calculated the distance they were traveling and made sure there is a gas station (near by) or have enough gas for their trip. Today, we get an alert in our dash board when we have 1/4th tank.

We used to manage our circadian rhythms to wake ourselves in the morning and now depend on Alarm clocks.

I used to remember all the phone numbers of my friends and family. Today, I need to look up my address book even for my own number, sometimes.

While driving I don’t have to remember which way I go to my destination. My GPS takes me where ever I want and brings me back home.

This generation has lesser physical activities than the previous generation – as part of their day to day routine.

We live an age of abundance and automation. We can get away giving less work for our brain to get through our day than ever before. While some of us are making use of that unused brain power for more complex thinking where as most of us relish the opportunity not to use the brain power at all.

The issue is not how much of memory or brain power we use but how we use it and what are the long term physiological and biological implications of that change. For example, what part of our brain or memory do we use when we remember and retrieve phone numbers and directions? Would that activity be replaced with something else to keep those parts of the brain active and sharp? In the book Think Smart author Richard Restak suggests that all parts our brain need regular exercise to avoid neurological and other ailments at later stages of our life.

Just the way current generation Gyms and Workout franchises have made their way to get us into shape, should we have clinics and gyms for training and keeping our brain and its parts active?

physical-labor-copy

to

women-computer

to

effw circuit women in gym

Just the way Physical labor (where you get paid for physical activities) replaced by Gyms (where you pay to get physical activities) in the desktop age, are we to see businesses where we pay to use our brain and keep our memory sharp in the near future?

I think governments, universities and educational institutions should collaborate with citizens to refine and redefine school curriculum based changing market needs – on a 3 to 5 year basis.

I will leave with you a fascinating talk by Ken Robinson who talks about a complete overhaul of our current education system at TED Conference.

—–

@Vsistla

Opinions expressed are mine own